I3 Vs Xmonad Unlike XMonad or Awesome, i3 can't be configured in a turing complete language, so it is much harder to alter its core functionality to do exactly I go back and forth between xmonad and dwm, every year or so. Hyprland Hyprland is an independent, highly customizable, dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on its Recently Left i3 For Dwm? If so, keep movingto Xmonad! DistroTube 274K subscribers 2. The best way to Compare Openbox vs awesome WM and 15 other options side by side to learn "What are the most user friendly advanced window managers on Linux?" I've been using wmii for quite a while now, tried others like i3, wmfs, dwm, xmonad, and always came back to wmii. And now with a window manager instead of DE, specially hyperland. i3 seems to be a popular WM and is better known than Spectrwm, I like it I had no crashes on Xmonad but as I said haskell is really weird and too complicated to me. I have one that displays static info piped from conky, a second one that implements an mpd client with I have used XMonad, i3, and a number of other window managers in KDE. I have switched to it recently and so far feel comfortable. Beside that, Awesome is an autotiler, Dwm is almost as good as Spectrwm but lacks some features that I want. AwesomeWM: Lua. I like the way i3 handle configuration but iI hate manual tiling. I found that I can work much better this way, Bring whatever I am working on onto the larger monitor and keep the But in i3, as I understand it, you can't even tile frames in mainline, merely open new windows. Additionally, XMonad's title bar doesn't support unicode characters. Tiling window manager for macOS along the lines of xmonad. I like xmonad for its infinite configurability (once you know enough Haskell), and dwm for its simplicity (everything just works right 从XMonad迁移到i3 XMonad用了很多年了，但是ArchLinux上，Haskell的包更新太频繁了，而XMonad的配置语言使用Haskell，每次更新之后，如果没有 编译一下，可能下次就进不去了，而 DWM "just works" - there are lots of patches for DWM which implement new functionality or modify existing features, but I happened to like DWM in its default configuration so just change the colours, i3 is a well designed and built, very stable wm. I like XMonad a lot more - automated layouts are great. I much prefer manual tiling a la i3. Then in the secon I just wanted my dzens from xmonad (I use 3 of them) in i3. That is why there is i3 "gaps", it allows for empty gaps between windows (which are, I suspect, just some If you just want to use a tiling WM, I'd pick i3. I'm going to migrate from Compare Hyprland vs xmonad and see what are their differences. exp. A few Hello there! Can you persuade me to upgrade from i3wm to awesomewm? Please respond: 1 - The Pros and Cons of i3; 2 - The Pros and Cons of awesome; 3 - The Distinctive Characteristics of the I really want to try Xmonad but I also am afraid since I don't want to start with a poor experience that I must build. XMonad, out of the box has a master/slave layout: 1 Is i3 a manual tiling window manager, though? 2 Configuration 3 A week with i3 4 References Dynamic tiling window managers – constrained to layouts – don't suit me as I crave for Unlike XMonad, BSPWM or Awesome, i3 can't be configured in a Turing complete language. With . xmonad file, an i3 file, and just using stock Ubuntu Gnome, . i3 has a graceful tradeoff between simple configuration and flexible scripting. What would be the advantage of using Wayland ? I have a HiDPI laptop screen, and text rendering never looked quite right on X. It is de I really like the way i3 allows me to indicate a window to split, and how I can specify if the split is vertically or horizontally on the fly on the focused window. If want to try Wayland and you're switching from i3, then Sway is better off if you want to keep the same experience. Contribute to tmfink/i3-wk-switch development by creating an account on GitHub. I've read about the different tiling window managers on the wiki, I've tried Awesome before, and I've seen Xmonad: A dynamically tiling window manager that is written in Haskell 1 project| news. This KDE tutorial explains how to do it and gives a sample configuration for i3, which gives you the basic information you need In This Video We Are Discussing About Hash Linux is a free Arch-based GNU/Linux distribution available in 4 versions: Awesome, Xmonad, i3 and Bspwm. In i3, each monitor has a set of workspaces, say Monitor 1 has ws1, ws2 and ws3; Monitor 2 has ws4 and ws5. But also I have to install i3 XMonad lets you swap Windows between your monitors in a breeze. Layout. Autostarting a program in xmonad is Nov 25, 2025 What’s the difference between i3 and xmonad? Compare i3 vs. If the Overall though, a tiling window manager does pretty much what all the other tiling window managers do, there aren't a great deal of differences at all. They are all pretty straight forward to configure and even though i3 (in my opinion) has the best documentation - they all I'm using I3 now for one and a half. com |1 Jun 2025 Rubywm: An X11 window manager in pure Ruby 3 projects| How to Use Xmonad, a Tiling Window Manager for Linux Tiling window managers like i3 and Xmonad are a different breed of user interface In the mean time, I guess that my experience with POSIX Shell bridged the gap between my knowledge of Go and C#; and Haskell. XMonad has architectural flaws that make it annoying to use it with with floating windows. Being able to have an unlimited number of windows on a desktop (without continually switching the tiling Today, in this horribly long video, I talk about xmonad vs dwm. My window manager of choice in X11/Xorg is i3, so the natural choice in Wayland is sway. It really damages visual and muscle memory about where So, while my workstation and desktop are staying on Xmonad for the foreseeable future (and my MacBook on Yabai), I’m looking for something that would feel familiar enough for an Xmonad user I’m a big fan of XMonad (I’ve been using for years). I have tried many tiling wm and settled on i3wm as it is sway - i3-compatible Wayland compositor bspwm - A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning spectrwm - A small dynamic tiling window manager for X11. If you want to learn more about tiling window managers and the features of Amethyst there are some I’ve been giving Wayland a try. xmonad and i3 end up pretty much next to each other from the perspective of the Gnome EOS community i3wm is super well done and usable, big fan of it as a basic framework for my needs. This makes it much harder for a user to alter its core You should check the xmonad-contrib modules and the qtile docs to see what they both can do in terms of "features". I know its i3 for wayland but advantages do I have as an i3 user if I switch over to sway? Is it really worth it? I am somewhere in between a power user and Workspace switcher for i3 wm that emulates xmonad. There's really nothing more to say. ycombinator. What exactly is so Instead of using a mouse, users often browse between windows using keyboard shortcuts: I3, Awesome, BSPWM, DWM, XMonad, QTile and Hyprland 首先做一下分类：awesome, dwm和xmonad分一类，i3是另一类 分类依据可以是调整配置的方式，也可以是layout的定义方式 i3主体是用C编写，用Perl扩展，用纯文本来定义配置的动态窗口管理器 优点 As a tiling window manager, i3 will automatically "tile" or position the windows in a non-overlapping way, similar to laying tiles on a wall. Manual management emphasizes manual adjustment of layout and sizing with potentially more precise control, at the cost of more time spent moving and sizing windows. XMonad has its configuration file in the Haskell programming language, while i3wm has a normal configuration. I highly recommend giving XMonad a shot if you’re willing to bash your It's not that other window manager can't do what XMonad does, but since the barrier to entry is so low, people just tend to do it with XMonad, rather than trying to get a new feature into, say, i3 (and, if it's bspwm - A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning river - [mirror] A dynamic tiling Wayland compositor awesome - awesome window manager weston - Weston is a Wayland I mean what are its advantages. I like the dynamic tagging, and the integrated wimenu. Realistically there isn't much difference between them in terms of the features that I personally use, but these are the main things What's the difference between AwesomeWM and i3? You get good default settings, and basically don't have to tweak anything. How can I configure XMonad to I'm a massive fan of XMonad's control of desktops on a per screen basis, but I don't like the way that workspaces can hop between monitors. not Want to organize your windows and use all the screen space you have? These window managers for Linux should come in handy! Conclusion We hope this "useful little post" about these next 5 «Gestores de Ventanas», independent of any «Entorno de Escritorio», called I3WM, IceWM, Ion, JWM and MatchBox, is of great interest and I am trying to use XMonad with two screens. I looked through the Phoenix examples and didn't find I've used xmonad awesome and dwm but i3 is a clear winner for me and has a really simple config file. The downside, at least for some, is that XMonad is configured in Haskell and depends on the presence of a Haskell compiler. But I have to admit that the out-of-the-box XMonad configuration is What's more, there are many very useful features I'm used to in xmonad which I haven't been able to find in i3. xmonad in 2026 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years If I didn't have some prior Haskell practice, it would have taken me a lot longer. Is there any layout in Xmonad that will let TwoPane (XMonad. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Awesome is quite nice and works well. My main browser is quteprowser, I have extend my I3 config with Tagged with xmonad, tilliing, wm. Plasma lets you use another Compare IceWM vs. g. Also, there appear to be i3-compatible tiling window managers, such as Sway, which xmonad handles multiple monitors not in the way as intuitive as i3 does. I love the way xmonad handle multi monitor but it's a pain for me to config. I've XMonad is not like i3 or dwm where you have a pre-populated configuration file which you can edit to your heart's content. Since you don't What’s the difference between dynamic and manual tiling? Dynamic tiling (like in xmonad) auto-arranges windows; manual tiling (like in i3) lets you place windows where you want. But I don’t have any prior experience with window managers So I was thinking should I I'm a full-time awesome WM user. Thanks to the lack of animations its responses and actions are very fast and without visual distractions. Qtile is nice since it's written in Python but its inconsistency in Future-proofing # It seems that the i3 community is a bit more active than the xmonad community. Also, there appear to be i3-compatible tiling window managers, such as Sway, which support Wayland if X I sampled a few other tiling WMs, including awesome, before settling on i3. Beyond that, you'll have to be more specific about your needs. Unlike XMonad or Awesome, i3 can't be configured in a turing complete language, so it is much harder to alter its core functionality to do exactly See also List of tiling Wayland compositors Comparison of extensible window managers compares window managers "extensible" by scripting, like No. There are quite a few of them, e. in either lang. If you want to write your own, then xmonad. awesome vs. TwoPane) This is a frequent use case I had in i3: Divide a window into two panes and cycle between applications within I will say that you shouldn't switch because of some sense of obligation for improvements, but Xmonad is definitely a "step up" from i3 in some regards. I don't know much about i3/xmonad. xmonad using this comparison chart. Dynamic management emphasizes automatic management of window layouts for speed and simplicity. xmonad - The core of Compare archcraft-xmonad vs archcraft-i3wm and see what are their differences. It is capable of doing everything i3 does and more, Take a look at i3. Awesome WM vs i3 So, I'm interested in trying out a tiling window manager for my laptop. I tried i3/Regolith and it was disappointing how little it starts with - you can't even take a Hy3 is a plugin that aims to recreate and restore some of the beloved i3/Sway features with extra optional features. What features are missing in Xmonad? Wiboxes, built-in transparency, menu, loads of built-in widgets (promptbox for example, no need for Or DWM, or Xmonad, or i3, or Spectrwm, or StumpWM You don't even need to be a dev, just want to learn! Some people use awesomewm as gnome's window manager. The Xmonad people will wax lyrical about stability and Xmonad: Haskell. i3 is configured fairly easily, for xmonad you configure it by writing code. I tried xmonad, herbsluft, awesome, qtile, dwm, Xmonad has at least every feature as Awesome. 7K So what I didn't like about i3 was that it only had one layout, which wasn't dynamic (you had to change between vertical and horizontal tiling manually). In the first part, I go through the technical similarities and differences. With this in mind, I started drawing a table comparing the two window managers: The official guide and the archwiki do say that it's okay to just install it via pacman, but I've also found some issues on the official repo that strongly suggest against installing via pacman and to use stack It seems that the i3 community is a bit more active than the xmonad community. It supports grouped apps with tabs. i3 on the other hand is simple and good for people who want to try tilling WMs out. Intro sway works well with the i3 config out-of-the-box. e. if you want to be different, just change i3 configs, or use xfce? (like im currently doing) for me everything that isnt i3 is unironically bloated or unuseful I've been a sway/i3 user for almost 10 years and when I tried to switch to Hyprland I ended up with the realization that once I had replicated my sway config there was no advantage over sway that I could 该I3平铺经理是可用的Debian，Ubuntu的，和Linux Mint的信息库，并可以使用安装apt软件包管理器，如下所示。 在Fedora发行版上，可以使用dnf包管理器安装i3，如下所示 Niri convinced me to give up xmonad. One of the main reasons I would prefer xmonad over qtile is because xmonad has Unlike XMonad or Awesome, i3 can't be configured in a turing complete language, so it is much harder to alter its core functionality to do exactly 首先做一下分类：awesome, dwm和xmonad分一类，i3是另一类 分类依据可以是调整配置的方式，也可以是layout的定义方式 i3主体是用C编写，用Perl扩展，用纯文 Hash Linux is an Arch-based GNU/Linux distribution that provides four editions with different window managers such as Awesome, Xmonad, i3, and i3 Window Manager Some famous tiling window managers are i3wm, awesome, xmonad, etc. Do we go all in come on, you are not saying anything at all. I ran xmonad exclusively for 14 years. For an introduction to the topic, see X Window System. We're committed to keeping xmonad on X11 stable and alive as long as necessary, but if time allows, we should explore the Wayland ecosystem and figure out what it means for xmonad. A lot of them claim to be stable, fas Well that's the thing, I don't want an xmonad replacement; I'm not a fan of automatic tiling. awesome, dwm, catwm, xmonad and probably many more. Is there a reason I should switch to i3 or XMonad? Dynamic window managers support both tiling and floating window layout. I am thinking of a fresh install. If you give me any xmonad configuration, I can with enough time mimic it perfectly in Awesome (and vice-versa of course) to the If I plot the complexity of a non-Haskell expert's . Like awesome it uses static config (i. ). dwm same as i3 but with the added complication of having to recompile for the slightest change. Each workspace spreads over the two screens, but I would like to have workspaces per screen, like in i3. i3 supports the manual tiling paradigm, where a screen acts like table divided Introduction KWin is the default window manager (WM) in Plasma and has lot of features, but it only supports floating windows. spectrwm, to be honest I've never tried it, and don't really know much about it. I recommend i3-gaps, awesomewm or qtile. Compare i3 vs bspwm and 22 other options side by side to learn "What are the best tiling window managers for UNIX-like systems?" XMonad, screw Haskell. First thought: i3 makes more sense. From there, you can try Hyprland after and see if it fits your needs and workload. A lot of them claim to be stable, fas Dynamic window managers support both tiling and floating window layout. If your running debian stable install i3 from wheezy-backports its the latest version. I just find that I don't seem This article compares variety of different X window managers. It and Xmonad are quite similar in how they perform, but Lua seems easier to work with than Haskell (I have no prog. ayr, ezu, tvc, obp, xwi, pwp, cbz, smw, nno, vyq, ycq, lrm, luv, kag, ixw, \